
The Five Domains of Equine Welfare
Equine welfare is an evolving discipline shaped by advances in animal science, veterinary medicine, and ethics. For veterinary professionals, a comprehensive understanding of welfare frameworks and their applications in clinical and management contexts is essential.
Horses are highly adaptable, yet their welfare is contingent upon how well their biological, behavioural, and psychological needs are met.
The Five Domains model offers a structured and evidence-based approach that helps practitioners identify areas of compromise while also promoting positive welfare states. This article examines each domain in detail and integrates real-world examples that demonstrate the application of welfare principles in practice.
1. Nutrition: The Foundation of Equine Health
Nutrition remains one of the most influential determinants of equine welfare. Horses evolved as grazing herbivores, adapted to consume small amounts of fibrous forage almost continuously throughout the day. Deviation from this feeding pattern, particularly through diets excessively reliant on cereals and concentrates, is strongly associated with gastrointestinal dysfunction, gastric ulceration, metabolic disorders, and behavioural pathology.
The Henneke Body Condition Scoring system, introduced in the early 1980s, provides a reliable and objective method for evaluating body condition. Horses are assessed on a scale from 1 (emaciated) to 9 (obese), with most individuals ideally maintained between 4 and 6 to balance health, athletic performance, and reproductive efficiency (Henneke et al., 1983). Veterinary professionals play a central role in advising owners on diet formulation, not only to prevent malnutrition but also to mitigate risks of obesity, insulin resistance, and laminitis.
Example – Metabolic Risk in Obesity
A middle-aged pony presented with a body condition score of 7 and acute lameness consistent with laminitis. Laboratory results confirmed hyperinsulinemia, indicative of Equine Metabolic Syndrome (EMS). A structured dietary plan was implemented under veterinary guidance, focusing on the gradual reduction of caloric intake, provision of low non-structural carbohydrate forage, and controlled grazing through the use of a muzzle. Over a 12-week period, the pony’s body condition improved to a score of 5, and laminitic episodes resolved. This case highlights the critical link between inappropriate nutrition and endocrine disorders, as well as the transformative impact of carefully managed dietary interventions.
2. Physical Health: Preventive Medicine and Emerging Technologies
Physical health forms a cornerstone of welfare assessment. Preventive care, including vaccination, routine dentistry, hoof care, and parasite control, should be viewed as non-negotiable aspects of welfare management. Pain, disease, or injury not only reduce physical wellbeing but also profoundly affect behaviour and emotional state, making the detection of subclinical issues a priority.
Veterinary practitioners must also consider how advances in diagnostic technologies can complement traditional clinical examination. Objective gait analysis systems, thermal imaging, and wearable biosensors now enable earlier detection of pathology, often before clinical lameness is evident. The integration of these tools into routine practice enhances welfare by reducing the duration of suffering and enabling more targeted interventions.
Example – Early Lameness Detection
A gelding in light training was referred following intermittent performance deficits that the owner attributed to fatigue. Clinical examination revealed subtle asymmetry, and the use of inertial measurement units (IMUs) combined with a convolutional neural network identified lameness with over 90% accuracy. Subsequent ultrasonography confirmed fetlock inflammation, which was treated promptly. Early detection not only prevented progression to chronic pathology but also avoided unnecessary training-related stress. This case illustrates how emerging technologies, when integrated with veterinary expertise, support both optimal welfare outcomes and long-term performance.
3. Physical Environment: Designing Systems to Support Welfare
The physical environment is a critical determinant of both physical and psychological wellbeing. Horses require environments that offer appropriate shelter from weather extremes, safe footing, adequate ventilation, and sufficient space for movement. Restrictive stabling without regular turnout has been repeatedly linked with respiratory disease, musculoskeletal stiffness, and the emergence of stereotypic behaviours such as weaving, crib-biting, and box-walking (Cooper and Albentosa, 2005).
Veterinarians play a vital advisory role in assessing whether stabling and management systems meet welfare needs. Attention must be given not only to structural design but also to factors such as social contact, substrate quality, and enrichment. Interventions that restore opportunities for natural movement and social interaction often yield rapid improvements in welfare and reduce the need for pharmacological or behavioural therapies.
Example – Rehabilitation of a Stereotypic Horse
A Warmblood gelding kept in solitary confinement for extended periods developed weaving and crib-biting behaviours, alongside reduced appetite and dull demeanour. Following veterinary and behavioural consultation, his management was altered to allow several hours of group turnout per day with familiar equines, ad libitum access to hay and enrichment items within the stable. Within six weeks, both the frequency and intensity of stereotypic behaviours were markedly reduced, and he showed increased social interaction and improved body condition. This demonstrates that changes in their environmental and a shift in the caregiver’s mindset are often the most effective intervention for stereotypic pathology.
4. Behavioural Interactions: Social Complexity and Systems Thinking
Horses are inherently social animals that rely on affiliative bonds within groups for security and psychological stability. Denial of opportunities for social interaction, such as through prolonged isolation, frequently leads to anxiety, aggression, or the emergence of abnormal behaviours. Welfare science increasingly applies systems thinking to behavioural problems, recognising that management practices, environment, diet, and human–horse interactions all interact to influence behaviour (Hausberger et al., 2021).
Veterinary practitioners should approach behavioural issues holistically, recognising that what appears to be a training or temperament problem may, in fact, stem from husbandry systems or underlying health concerns. Interdisciplinary collaboration with behaviourists, trainers, and caregivers can provide sustainable solutions that prioritise equine welfare.
Example – A Systems Approach to Performance Issues
A dressage horse presented with persistent resistance during training, described by the trainer as disobedience. Veterinary assessment excluded pain and pathology, prompting an intensive handling and nutritional review. The horse was maintained on a high-starch diet, had limited turnout, and was inconsistently handled by multiple staff members. Adjustments were made to provide daily turnout, a veterinary nutritionist approved forage-based diet, and consistent, experienced handling by caregivers and trainers who put the horse’s welfare first instead of focusing on the “prize.” Within two months, the behavioural issues resolved entirely. This case highlights how a systems approach allows veterinarians and qualified behaviourist to address the multifactorial origins of behavioural concerns, improving both performance and welfare.
5. Mental State: Integrating Affective Experience
The mental domain is central to the Five Domains model, acknowledging that good welfare encompasses not just the absence of suffering but the presence of positive affective states. Horses are sentient beings capable of experiencing comfort, pleasure, play, curiosity, fear, and frustration. Management systems and training practices directly influence these emotional states, with aversive methods, excessive isolation, or unpredictable routines contributing to chronic stress.
Veterinary practitioners should encourage owners to view emotional wellbeing as an essential welfare component. This involves promoting positive reinforcement training, providing predictable routines, and enabling horses to experience agency and control in their environment. Educational interventions are particularly valuable in bridging the gap between scientific knowledge and owner perception.
Example – Owner Education on Emotional States
An equestrian group participated in a survey assessing their ability to recognise equine emotional states. Initial findings revealed widespread under-recognition of stress behaviours such as facial tension, avoidance, and ear positioning. After exposure to an infographic based on the Five Domains model, participants demonstrated significantly improved ability to identify both positive and negative affective states. This highlights how targeted education can transform owner understanding and, consequently, equine welfare.
The Veterinary Role in Operationalising Welfare
Veterinarians are uniquely positioned to operationalise welfare assessment at both individual and population levels. The use of structured frameworks such as the Five Domains checklist ensures that all aspects of welfare (nutrition, health, environment, behaviour, and mental state) are systematically evaluated during consultations (Mellor and Beausoleil, 2015).
Beyond the individual level, welfare frameworks are increasingly being adopted at industry scale. New Zealand Thoroughbred Racing, for example, has applied Five Domains principles across the sector, ensuring that welfare is embedded throughout the lifespan of racehorses, from breeding through to retirement (Mellor et al., 2020). Veterinary involvement in these initiatives not only safeguards welfare but also enhances public trust in equine industries.
Something to Think About
Equine welfare is multidimensional and requires simultaneous attention to nutrition, physical health, environment, behaviour, and mental state. These domains are deeply interconnected, and compromise in one inevitably affects the others. Veterinary practitioners are central to ensuring that equine welfare is both protected and advanced, through preventive medicine, evidence-based interventions, and owner education.
The integration of the Five Domains model into daily practice moves welfare assessment beyond the simple prevention of harm. It facilitates the active promotion of positive experiences, strengthening the quality of life for horses and reinforcing the human–equine bond that has shaped our shared history for millennia.
References
Cooper, J.J. and Albentosa, M.J. (2005) ‘Behavioural adaptation in the domestic horse: Potential role of apparently “abnormal” responses including stereotypic behaviour’, Livestock Production Science, 92(2), pp. 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.11.017.
Fletcher, J., Cameron, A. and Freeman, S. (2021) ‘Contemplating the Five Domains model of animal welfare assessment: UK horse owner perceptions of equine wellbeing’, Animal Welfare, 30(4), pp. 413–425.
Frank, N., Geor, R.J., Bailey, S.R., Durham, A.E. and Johnson, P.J. (2010) ‘Equine Metabolic Syndrome’, Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 24(3), pp. 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0503.x.
Henneke, D.R., Potter, G.D., Kreider, J.L. and Yeates, B.F. (1983) ‘Relationship between condition score, physical measurements and body fat percentage in mares’, Equine Veterinary Journal, 15(4), pp. 371–372.
Luke, T.J., Rawluk, A. and McAdie, M. (2022) ‘A new approach to horse welfare based on systems thinking’, Animal Welfare, 31(1), pp. 37–49. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.31.1.037.
McBride, S.D. and Cuddeford, D. (2001) ‘The putative welfare-reducing effects of preventing equine stereotypic behaviour’, Animal Welfare, 10(2), pp. 173–189.
Mellor, D.J. and Beausoleil, N.J. (2015) ‘Extending the “Five Domains” model for animal welfare assessment to incorporate positive welfare states’, Animal Welfare, 24(3), pp. 241–253. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.24.3.241.
Mellor, D.J. and Burns, R. (2020) ‘Re-framing animal welfare and the roles of veterinarians: Why the “Five Domains” model is central’, New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 68(4), pp. 202–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2020.1724915.
New Zealand Thoroughbred Racing (2023) Thoroughbred welfare guidelines: Principles. Available at: https://loveracing.nz/thoroughbred-welfare (Accessed: 27 August 2025).
Savoini, M., Diaz Perez, F., Kooij, K., De Bie, S., Bijnens, W., Bussche, A.V. and Davis, J. (2025) ‘Convolutional neural network for early detection of lameness using inertial measurement units on horses’, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.13578. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.13578.
Wells, A., Hiney, K.M., Brady, C.M. and Anderson, K.A. (2025) ‘Enhancing equine welfare: A qualitative study on the impact of RAiSE (Recognizing Affective States in Equine) as an educational tool’, Translational Animal Science, 9, txaf033. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf033.
